Appeals court panel questions Trump's challenge to presidential records law
4 sourcesLeft-leaning 1Center 1Right-leaning 2
Summary
A three-judge D.C. Circuit panel appeared skeptical of the Justice Department's argument that the 1978 Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional. The case stems from accusations Trump violated the law by storing classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Federal attorneys argued presidents historically owned their records until Watergate-era changes; judges Patricia Millett and Cornelia Pillard questioned whether that position could endanger government record-keeping.
Left-leaning
- Appeals Court Questions Justice Dept. Claim That Trump Owns White House RecordsNew York Times · Oct 16, 9:42 PM
Center
- Appeals court appears to reject Trump claims of records ownershipUPI · Oct 16, 8:03 PM
Right-leaning
- Appeals Court Weighs WH Challenge to Records LawNewsmax · Oct 16, 8:27 PM
- Appeals court presses hard against Trump’s argument for private ownership of presidential recordsWashington Examiner · Oct 17, 12:04 PM